Last verified: August 3, 2026
On this page:The recordThe shutdownThe blanksThe returnThe moneyThe coverageFAQ
01 · The record
The group’s least-documented casino
OnPoint ran at onpointcasino.us as a sweepstakes casino for US players, one of six the Sweepium group operated, and it left the shallowest public footprint of any of them. It opened at some point in 2025 – the year is as precise as any source gets – on the model every brand in the group used: gold coins bought for entertainment, sweeps coins that could become prize money.
What ties the brand to the group is not a review or a press release but the domain itself. The Internet Archive holds exactly one capture of onpointcasino.us, dated 13 March 2025, and it is a pre-launch placeholder: the Sweepium wordmark in the group’s blocky pixel lettering, sitting above a single line of text.
The entire archived history of OnPoint’s domain, captured 13 March 2025 and re-examined 14 July 2026. The group put its own name on the domain before the casino ever opened – its only surviving self-identification for this brand.
Behind the storefront sat the corporate arrangement common to the group’s five other casinos, a structure the Sweepium record pulls apart entity by entity. Everything on this page is OnPoint’s own story: what little was recorded while it lived, and what happened to its address after it died.
02 · The shutdown
United States – notice on 1 November, gone on the 16th
The end came on the group’s autumn schedule. On 1 November 2025 four of its casinos, OnPoint among them, told their signed-in players they were closing permanently; on 16 November all four went. Trade coverage put OnPoint’s name in print as it happened: a 15 November 2025 casino.com report by Richard Janvrin named OnPoint, LuckyStars and Turbo Stakes as the three closing that weekend and set out the terms all of them had posted.
By those terms the shutdown ran as a fifteen-day countdown. Coin play continued for existing members, coin purchases stopped, and, in the template’s words, “New users are not able to register for an Account during the Shutdown Period.” Whatever remained unredeemed when the countdown reached zero was treated as forfeited. The wording is quoted from casino.com’s report because OnPoint’s copy of the notice appeared behind its login and was never archived.
In fact the record holds no OnPoint-specific trace of the notice at all – no screenshot, no coin codes of its own, no transcription. Its three siblings each left at least a fragment of their individual notices in quotation; OnPoint left only its name in the roll call.
03 · The blanks
What was never written down
Four of OnPoint’s sibling casinos left a corporate signature: footers naming the company that owned the brand and the company that operated it, preserved in web archives. OnPoint’s footer was never captured. With one pre-launch placeholder as the domain’s entire archive, whatever the live site declared about its ownership went unpreserved, and no outlet copied it down while it could still be read.
Coverage splits the difference. The closure trackers file OnPoint under one of the group’s two operating companies; casino.com’s report attributes it to “SWPMSystem LLC/SWPMTECH LLC”, either-or. Nobody recorded which company actually stood behind OnPoint when it took its players’ money, and no register can be searched for a name nobody wrote down.
What is established: the closure date, the group membership, the template terms, the domain. What is not: the operator’s identity, the launch date, the notice’s exact wording, and any figure for what players were owed. This page will be updated if any of those surface in a verifiable form.
04 · The return
The relaunch at the dead casino’s domain
Six months after the shutdown, onpointcasino.us reopened. The relaunch dates to May 2026, per the earliest review revision to describe it, and on 14 July 2026 CasinoGone found it live and trading as “OnPoint | Sportsbook & Casino”: slots from mainstream studios, live dealer tables, a sportsbook, sign-up buttons at every scroll depth, and a footer document titled “Gaming Authorization & Social Sweepstakes Compliance Model” confirming the sweepstakes machinery is back in service. The page as found that day is preserved at archive.ph/TtP7x.
Who runs it is a different question, and the site’s own pages answer with silence. The footer reads “© 2026 OnPoint | All Rights Reserved” and names no company, no address, no jurisdiction. Its legal documents – terms, refund policy, an anti-money-laundering policy, even the “Contact Us” link – are files parked on Google Drive. The only company name attached to the operation anywhere is in the domain’s WHOIS record: OnPoint Administration LLC, listed at Suite A, 8 The Green, Dover, Delaware, one of the most heavily shared registered-agent addresses in the United States. That WHOIS record was updated on 19 December 2025, five weeks after the casino closed. A company by that name could not be located through public searches, and Delaware’s register does not expose filings to unauthenticated queries, so the name stays self-declared.
The relaunch also describes itself in the language the group’s brands adopted in their final weeks. “OnPoint is a social casino offering free entertainment games for users 18 and over,” the footer states. “We do not offer or promote real-money gambling. OnPoint has no affiliations with real-money gambling brands, logos, or marks.” That disclaimer shares a page with live dealer tables and a sportsbook, and pitches the site at 18-year-olds where 21 is the sweeps-industry norm. And nowhere – not the footer, not the compliance page, not any document the site links out to – is there a word about November 2025, the casino that carried this name before, or the balances it left behind.
None of this establishes who is behind the relaunch, and this record does not claim to know. What the public record establishes is narrower and stranger: a domain the Sweepium group branded before launch, dead with its players unpaid in November, had its registration refreshed within weeks and was selling casino play again by May under a company visible only in WHOIS. OnPoint is the second brand from this group to resurface in 2026 – its sibling TurboStakes came back months earlier under a Wyoming company of its own – and in neither case has the returning operation said a word about the money the departing one kept.
05 · The money
Owed at the deadline, unanswered since
OnPoint’s balance sheet with its players was never published, and no OnPoint-specific player report – an amount, a stuck redemption, a completed payout – has surfaced in any forum or tracker this site monitors. The UNPAID status is carried over from the group: reporting across all six casinos describes pending redemptions that stopped being honoured, and nothing anywhere suggests OnPoint handled its endgame differently from the casinos it shared a notice with. That attribution is stated here openly because it is the strongest claim the evidence supports.
The template’s arithmetic was unforgiving in any case. Redemptions carried a 100 SC minimum, so small balances had no claim to file, and whatever was still unclaimed once 16 November passed was written off by the template itself.
Getting your money back
What works: pursuing the purchases through whoever processed them. Card and digital-wallet payments for OnPoint’s gold coins can be put to the issuer as disputes over services paid for and then withdrawn – a route that needs nothing from the casino, which is fortunate, because the casino has nothing to offer it.
The window: dispute rights lasted about sixty days per statement, a clock that has run out for most OnPoint purchases. Past it, the CFPB accepts complaints about an issuer’s refusal at no cost, and issuers are required to respond.
What builds the record: formal complaints – to the FTC federally, and to the attorney general in your state – naming the closed casino and, where relevant, the relaunch now trading on its name. Documented restitution in this industry’s collapse has happened exactly once, through a state action built on complaint files – which is the argument for adding yours.
What fails: expecting either OnPoint to answer for it. The original operation never named itself and left no reachable contact; the relaunch acknowledges no predecessor and publishes no route to raise one.
For dispute framing banks accept, and the escalation when they refuse, see the bank-dispute route explained on the recourse hub.
Stranded balances attract a second wave of predators. The FBI’s IC3 alert I-062424-PSA (24 June 2024) documented fake law firms targeting scam victims, with over $9.9 million in reported losses in a single year, and IC3 stated in August 2025 that it never works with private recovery firms and never contacts victims asking for money. The FTC’s rule of thumb is absolute: any upfront fee to recover money is itself a scam.
- Red flags: upfront, processing, tax or release fees; guaranteed recovery; cold DMs; a move to Telegram or WhatsApp; payment by gift card, crypto or wire; impersonation of law firms or agencies.
- Report fraud free of charge at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov.
06 · The coverage
How the relaunch is being written up
The review economy has moved on to assessing the relaunch, and the past is getting compressed on the way. SweepsKings’ OnPoint review, updated 4 June 2026, treats the site as a going concern and folds the brand’s history into a launch that “got off to a rough start” – the 2025 closure acknowledged in passing, the unpaid balances absent entirely. Domain-reputation checkers, which score infrastructure signals rather than conduct, currently rate onpointcasino.us as safe-looking; nothing they measure knows what happened last November.
For the search record, then: the OnPoint sweepstakes casino that operated in 2025 closed on 16 November 2025; its players’ pending redemptions have never been reported paid. The site now answering at its domain is a 2026 operation that has published no connection to, and no responsibility for, any of that. A review of the new site is not evidence about the old one’s debts, however exactly the name matches.
07 · The questions
OnPoint – what the record can answer
Q. Is the OnPoint sweepstakes casino gone?
The casino that ran in 2025 is. Players got the permanent-closure notice dated 1 November 2025, and the site shut on 16 November 2025 along with three sibling brands. The site trading at onpointcasino.us since May 2026 is a relaunch that names no company and mentions no history.
Q. Is the site at onpointcasino.us today the same casino?
Domain and brand name are unchanged, and archive evidence ties that domain to the Sweepium group from before the casino first opened. Whether any of the same people are involved is not established by any public record: the relaunch identifies its operator only in a WHOIS entry naming OnPoint Administration LLC at a shared Delaware registered-agent address.
Q. Do old OnPoint balances work on the relaunched site?
No, and nothing indicates they ever will. As of 14 July 2026 the relaunched site makes no reference to pre-shutdown accounts, coins or redemptions anywhere a visitor can read. Balances unclaimed at the 16 November 2025 deadline were forfeited under the shutdown terms, and no honouring of them has been reported since.
Q. Why does no company name appear on OnPoint’s closure record?
Because none was ever preserved. Sibling casinos’ footers, naming their owner and operator companies, survive in web archives; OnPoint’s site was archived exactly once, on a pre-launch placeholder page, so its own declarations are lost. News coverage attributed it to the group’s operating companies without settling which one.
Q. How was OnPoint connected to Sweepium?
By its own domain. Months before the casino opened, onpointcasino.us displayed the Sweepium wordmark over a coming-soon line, the group’s only surviving self-identification of the brand. The casino then closed on the group’s common timetable. The wider company structure is documented on the cluster record for the whole group.
✓ · The receipts
How we verified this record
Every claim on this page is graded by how firmly the record supports it. “Confirmed” means more than one independent source agrees, or we saw it ourselves. “Observed” means we checked it directly on the date shown. “Unconfirmed” means it rests on a single report we could not independently prove.